Deleveraging, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF) Outflows, and a Fragile Technical Rebound (February 18 – 25, 2026) [Midweek Review]
selective focus of bitcoins on laptop computers

During the period of February 18 and 25, 2026, the cryptocurrency market was defined by volatility, institutional caution, and key technical support tests. After a turbulent first half of February, the market entered this week with an already fragile sentiment. What followed was a sequence of lower-range consolidation, short-term capitulation, and a modest but technically meaningful rebound into February 25, 2026.

Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) both experienced notable price swings within established February downtrends, while ETF flows, derivatives positioning, and macroeconomic risk appetite shaped directional bias.

BTC Testing Structural Support Before Relief

BTC entered the period, trading within a broader corrective structure that had dominated much of the month. After earlier declines in the month, it hovered in the mid-$60,000 range, attempting to stabilize above critical horizontal support.

Price Movement:
  • Feb. 18–20: BTC traded defensively between approximately $66,000 and $64,500, failing to sustain upside attempts. Sellers remained active on intraday rallies.
  • Feb. 21–23: Increased selling pressure pushed Bitcoin toward the $63,000–$64,000 zone, briefly breaching short-term support. And triggered stop-loss cascades below $64K in derivatives markets.
  • Feb. 24: Market conditions showed volatility plunging to $63,000 levels, suggesting more supply.
  • Feb. 25: BTC staged a modest rebound, reclaiming levels above $65,000, gaining roughly 2–3%.

Technical Structure: the $62,000–$64,000 range emerged as a key demand zone, while resistance remained grouped between $66,500 and $68,000, where prior breakdowns occurred. Momentum indicators signalled oversold conditions mid-week before curling upward.

Importantly, BTC did not invalidate the broader months’ correction. Instead, it formed what could be interpreted as a short-term base, though confirmation would require sustained closes above $68,000.

Institutional Flows: Spot BTC ETFs recorded continued net outflows, reflecting institutional risk reset. While not panic-driven, the steady withdrawals reinforced the narrative of capital rotation away from speculative exposure amidst global macroeconomic uncertainty. This implies that the coins’ rebound during the early hours of Feb. 25 is technically driven rather than institutionally led.

Ethereum (ETH): Relative Weakness, Key Support Defense

ETH mirrored BTC’s path but showed slightly weaker relative strength.

Price Movement:

  • Feb 18: ETH traded near the $1,950–$2,000 region, already under pressure from earlier February declines.
  • Feb 20–23: Accelerated selling pushed it toward the $1,800 support level, a psychological and technical meaningful threshold.
  • Feb 24: Stabilized just above $1,800, preventing a deeper technical breakdown.
  • Feb 25:  Rebounded modestly toward the $1,880–$1,900 range, tracking BTC’s recovery.

ETH’s revealed a descending channel structure still intact with strong buyer defense around $1,800, and resistance near $1,950–$2,000, where prior breakdown momentum began.

The ETH/BTC ratio softened slightly during the week, signalling capital preference toward the flagship coin over higher-beta altcoins in uncertain conditions.

Derivatives & Liquidation Scene: The derivatives market played a central role in this week’s volatility. With funding rates fluctuating between neutral and slightly negative, leveraged long liquidations intensified during the Feb 21–23 decline. Open interest compressed mid-week, suggesting deleveraging rather than aggressive short expansion.

This pattern indicates a controlled flush of speculative excess, rather than systemic stress. Such environments often precede short-term technical rebounds, precisely what materialized during the early hours on February 25.

ETF Flows and Institutional Sentiment: Spot ETF data throughout the week reflected continued net outflows from both BTC and ETH, as well as reduced daily trading volumes compared to early February, and institutional caution due to broader macroeconomic uncertainty.

With no evidence of panic liquidation, however, conviction buying was notably absent as institutions appear to be in a “wait-and-see” posture, monitoring macro indicators and liquidity conditions before redeploying capital.

This institutional hesitation capped upside momentum despite technical oversold signals.

Macro Influence & Risk Appetite: The broader financial environment influenced crypto price action in the following notable ways: as it maintained a positive correlation with U.S. equities risk-off sessions early in the week. A relatively firm dollar limited upside momentum in risk assets, and attractive traditional fixed-income yields continued to offer investors alternatives to volatile crypto exposure. Thus, the rebound today appears more tactical than structural.

Other Developments:
  • Nigeria and South Africa are leading the fastest growth in stablecoin demand globally, according to the Stablecoin Utility Report by YouGov, BVNK, Coinbase, and Artemis, which surveyed over 4,650 current or prospective crypto users across 15 countries. Nearly 80% of respondents in both countries already hold stablecoins, with over 75% planning to increase their holdings, while 95% of Nigerians said they would prefer to receive payments in stablecoins rather than Naira. Adoption intent among non-holders is roughly twice as high in low- and middle-income economies compared to high-income ones. However, usage remains concentrated in crypto trading, which accounts for nearly 90% of transactions, with only about 6% used for goods and services. The global stablecoin market exceeds $310 billion, dominated by dollar-pegged tokens like Tether ($185 billion) and USDC ($75 billion), raising concerns about dollarisation and capital flight even as U.S. regulatory moves such as the GENIUS Act are expected to spur further growth.
  • Crypto.com received a conditional approval from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a national trust bank charter, marking a key step toward operating as a federally regulated digital asset custodian under U.S. banking supervision. The approval allows it to charter Foris Dax National Trust Bank, doing business as Crypto.com National Trust Bank, which, once fully authorized, can provide custody, staking, and trade settlement services under OCC oversight, though it will not accept cash deposits or issue loans. The move comes as U.S. regulators adopt a more crypto-friendly stance, and analysts say such a charter is important for crypto firms to attract institutional clients and integrate more closely with the traditional financial system.

The period signalled that the crypto market did not stage a decisive reversal, but it did demonstrate resilience.

Key themes that emerged were:

  1. Controlled Deleveraging: The market absorbed leveraged excess without systemic breakdown. This strengthens structural stability but does not confirm renewed bullish momentum.
  2. Critical Support Defense: BTC’s held above the $62K–$64K region, and ETH’s guard of $1,800 were technically significant. A failure at these levels could have accelerated downside volatility.
  3. Institutional Patience: ETF outflows and muted inflows suggest capital preservation remains a priority. Institutional re-engagement will likely be the catalyst required for a sustained breakout.

What Lies Ahead

From a technical perspective:

  • Bullish Confirmation: BTC sustained above $68,000; ETH above $2,000.
  • Bearish Risk: Loss of $62,000 (BTC) or $1,800 (ETH).
  • Neutral Scenario: Continued range-bound movement.

February’s broader correction reflects a repricing rather than structural damage. On-chain fundamentals remain intact, but liquidity flows and macroeconomic events remain the determining factor.

Crypto markets are recalibrating. And in recalibration phases, discipline separates traders from spectators.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *